Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4715 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 53% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5680 - 139 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
