Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 266 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 115% better in Starfield than Radeon Pro W6400 - 43 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $239.99 vs $243.49
- Up to 54% better value when playing Starfield than Radeon Pro W6400 - $5.58 vs $12.17 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 8 vs 4 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241512 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
20%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |