Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 2065 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 54% cheaper than Radeon R9 290 - $138.29 vs $299.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Radeon R9 290 - $1.3 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 65 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 17% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 124 vs 106 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
106
85.48387096774194%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311930 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
53.941908713692946%
Price, $
$299
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311930 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
34.185777924434916%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
27.35313531353135%
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $399 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 947 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |