Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 2997 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Radeon Pro W6400 - 99 vs 98 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 19% cheaper than Radeon R9 290 - $243.49 vs $299.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Rust than Radeon R9 290 - $2.48 vs $3.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 50 vs 275 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241735 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
98
98%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$243.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
73%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$399 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |