Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the more expensive Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 3291 days newer than the more expensive Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 115 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 48% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 260X - 89 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Radeon R7 260X - $239.99 vs $246.31
- Up to 34% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 260X - $2.7 vs $4.11 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 8 vs 2 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $246.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241492 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$139 | MSRP | $289 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |