Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 2065 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 37% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 52 vs 38 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 54% cheaper than Radeon R9 290 - $138.29 vs $299.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R9 290 - $3.64 vs $5.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 65 vs 275 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.75/FPS
63.30434782608696%
Price, $
$299
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312295 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
38
73.07692307692307%
Value, $/FPS
$3.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
34.185777924434916%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
27.35313531353135%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$399 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |