Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 480 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 480 is 2296 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 480
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Arc A310 - 53 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 67% cheaper than Radeon RX 480 - $99.99 vs $299.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Radeon RX 480 - $2.17 vs $5.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 480 - 30 vs 150 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.64/FPS
38.47517730496454%
Price, $
$299
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312026 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
46
86.79245283018868%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
69.11873611453963%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
30.71859572133845%
AMD Radeon RX 480 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$229 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1120 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1266 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |