Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 281 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 44% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3050 - $99.99 vs $179.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than GeForce RTX 3050 - $1.89 vs $2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 30 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 43% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Arc A310 - 76 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
53
69.73684210526315%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310336 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
79.74683544303797%
Price, $
$179.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
49.24375659514597%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
39.381153305203945%
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |