Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1268 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 35% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $99.99 vs $154.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than GeForce GTX 1650 - $1.89 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 9% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Arc A310 - 58 vs 53 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
53
91.37931034482759%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310336 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.67/FPS
70.78651685393258%
Price, $
$154.99
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
52.552552552552555%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
60.06006006006006%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |