Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 1457 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 85% cheaper than Radeon R7 260X - $35.99 vs $246.31
- Up to 76% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon R7 260X - $4.0 vs $16.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 31 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 67% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than GeForce 210 - 15 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 2 vs 0 GB
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $35.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311745 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
15
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.42/FPS
24.360535931790498%
Price, $
$246.31
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $246.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
11.818181818181818%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
6.753246753246753%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |