Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 2722 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 94% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 9100 - $59.96 vs $946.69
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Radeon Pro WX 9100 - $8.57 vs $16.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 58 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 700% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GT 220 - 56 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 16 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
7
12.5%
Value, $/FPS
$8.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313048 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.91/FPS
50.680070963926674%
Price, $
$946.69
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $946.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313048 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |