Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 596 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 175 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 22% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $50.0 vs $63.83
- Up to 14% better value when playing Rust than Athlon 3000G - $0.31 vs $0.36 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280296 minutes ago
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |