Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8300 - 85 vs 67 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 25% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $47.98 vs $63.83
- Up to 4% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Athlon 3000G - $0.72 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353887 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
67
78.82352941176471%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353886 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |