Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3237 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-2600K - 153 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $63.83 vs $70.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-2600K - $0.42 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353735 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
148
96.73202614379085%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
89.36170212765958%
Price, $
$70
91%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353733 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |