Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 316 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $63.83 vs $112.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-9400F - $1.68 vs $2.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 34% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 51 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
38
74.50980392156863%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
76.36363636363636%
Price, $
$112
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
69.44847605224965%
Multi-Core
1975
40.856433595366155%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |