Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $63.83 vs $99.03
- Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10100 - $0.55 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
116
95.08196721311475%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
67.90123456790124%
Price, $
$99.03
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
67.11079943899018%
Multi-Core
1975
46.8564650059312%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |