Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2949 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i7-2700K - 195 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $63.83 vs $82.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-2700K - $0.33 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
192
98.46153846153847%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
76.74418604651163%
Price, $
$82
77%
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |