Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1051 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $63.83 vs $66.82
- Up to 3% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7100T - $0.64 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 102 vs 99 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
99
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280300 minutes ago
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |