Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 397 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $63.83 vs $550.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900X - $0.41 vs $2.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Athlon 3000G - 185 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
155
83.78378378378379%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.97/FPS
13.804713804713803%
Price, $
$550
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
64.31451612903226%
Multi-Core
1975
20.754518705338377%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |