Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1141 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $63.83 vs $567.98
- Up to 87% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900 - $0.55 vs $4.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 136 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
116
85.29411764705883%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.18/FPS
13.157894736842108%
Price, $
$567.98
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
35.26160648489315%
Multi-Core
1975
12.023621088518203%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |