Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 136 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $63.83 vs $445.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.55 vs $3.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
116
92.80000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.56/FPS
15.449438202247192%
Price, $
$445
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
56.526875369167165%
Multi-Core
1975
19.87321392634333%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Picasso | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |