Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $100.0 vs $218.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11500 - $0.9 vs $1.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 128 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
52.63157894736842%
Price, $
$218.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |