Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $100.0 vs $244.85
- Up to 51% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13500 - $0.9 vs $1.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 133 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
83.45864661654136%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348974 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
48.91304347826087%
Price, $
$244.85
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348974 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |