Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8500 is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-8500 - $100.0 vs $159.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-8500 - $2.27 vs $2.76 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8500
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 58 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
44
75.86206896551724%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349458 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.76/FPS
82.24637681159422%
Price, $
$159.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-8500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |