Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 3111 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $100.0 vs $253.44
- Up to 23% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-12700K - $0.76 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 93% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 255 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
132
51.76470588235295%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348967 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
76.76767676767678%
Price, $
$253.44
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $253.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |