Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $100.0 vs $373.59
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-13700K - $0.79 vs $2.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6350 - 149 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
127
85.23489932885906%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
31.474103585657375%
Price, $
$373.59
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $373.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |