Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $100.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-6900K - $0.61 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than FX-6350 - 172 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
163
94.76744186046511%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349458 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
72.61904761904762%
Price, $
$145
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |