Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $100.0 vs $252.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-7700K - $0.76 vs $1.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 44% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 190 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
132
69.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348966 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
57.14285714285714%
Price, $
$252
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |