Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3111 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $100.0 vs $376.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-12900K - $0.71 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 72% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 243 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
58.0246913580247%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
45.80645161290322%
Price, $
$376.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $376.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |