Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 2364 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than FX-8150 - 166 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-8150 - $50.0 vs $64.03
- Up to 25% better value when playing God of War than FX-8150 - $0.27 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
162
97.59036144578313%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
75.00000000000001%
Price, $
$64.03
78%
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354123 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |