Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 690 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 8% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8150 - 198 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than FX-8150 - $43.0 vs $64.03
- Up to 37% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than FX-8150 - $0.22 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
183
92.42424242424242%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
62.85714285714287%
Price, $
$64.03
67%
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358167 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |