Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8150 is 781 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 28% cheaper than FX-8150 - $46.41 vs $64.03
- Up to 28% better value when playing Stray than FX-8150 - $0.26 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358168 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |