Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than FX-8350 - 175 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than FX-8350 - $112.53 vs $185.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing God of War than FX-8350 - $0.64 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
93.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
56.63716814159293%
Price, $
$185
60%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359795 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |