Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $185.0 vs $297.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13600K - $0.97 vs $1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 225 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
84.44444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
73.48484848484847%
Price, $
$297.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |