Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6850K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6850K is 1316 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 27% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8350 - 117 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-8350 - $120.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than FX-8350 - $1.03 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
92
78.63247863247864%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
51.24378109452737%
Price, $
$185
64%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359777 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359778 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |