Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2834 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $185.0 vs $286.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10850K - $0.58 vs $0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8350 - 362 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
319
88.12154696132598%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
362
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
73.41772151898734%
Price, $
$286
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |