Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $185.0 vs $359.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-9900KF - $0.72 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Apex Legends than FX-8350 - 284 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
257
90.49295774647888%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
57.14285714285714%
Price, $
$359
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |