Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $276.99 vs $490.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i9-10900K - $3.6 vs $5.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Hogwarts Legacy than FX-8370 - 90 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
77
85.55555555555556%
Value, $/FPS
$3.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360461 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.44/FPS
66.17647058823529%
Price, $
$490
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |