Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 47% better in Rust than FX-8370 - 230 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than FX-8370 - $240.0 vs $276.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Rust than FX-8370 - $1.04 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
156
67.82608695652173%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
58.42696629213483%
Price, $
$276.99
86%
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352433 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |