Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $276.99 vs $567.98
- Up to 42% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900 - $1.46 vs $2.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 19% better in Valheim than FX-8370 - 226 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
190
84.070796460177%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360809 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
58.16733067729084%
Price, $
$567.98
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360809 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |