Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 57% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900F - 94 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $244.77 vs $567.98
- Up to 32% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900 - $4.08 vs $6.04 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.04/FPS
67.54966887417218%
Price, $
$567.98
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
63.829787234042556%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
61.75386882829772%
Multi-Core
8426
51.2967247047364%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |