Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1882 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $276.99 vs $535.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KS - $0.62 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 125 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 35% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8370 - 606 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
449
74.0924092409241%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360479 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
606
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
70.45454545454545%
Price, $
$535
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 127 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |