Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than FX-9590 - $113.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 68% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - $0.57 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
169
84.92462311557789%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
32.38636363636363%
Price, $
$298.02
37%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |