Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1085 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than FX-9590 - $108.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 65% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - $0.81 vs $2.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 140 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
128
95.52238805970148%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
34.76394849785408%
Price, $
$298.02
36%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348841 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348842 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |