Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $298.02 vs $567.98
- Up to 39% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-13900 - $1.77 vs $2.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-9590 - 195 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
168
86.15384615384616%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350546 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
60.824742268041234%
Price, $
$567.98
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |