Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3395 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $298.02 vs $522.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900K - $0.66 vs $0.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 69% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 766 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
59.268929503916446%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350410 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
766
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
97.05882352941177%
Price, $
$522.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |