Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1956 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $298.02 vs $468.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-9900K - $1.55 vs $2.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-9590 - 209 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
192
91.86602870813397%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350308 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
69.19642857142857%
Price, $
$468
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |