Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $244.77 vs $468.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-9900K - $4.08 vs $7.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.8/FPS
52.307692307692314%
Price, $
$468
52%
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348553 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348553 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1668
99.52267303102626%
Multi-Core
7960
94.46949916923806%
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |