Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2330 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $298.02 vs $535.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KS - $0.66 vs $0.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 33% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 606 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 127 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
74.91749174917491%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350408 minutes ago
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 127 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |