Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $80.0 vs $99.03
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 29% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 3200G - 53 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 3200G - $1.68 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
41
77.35849056603774%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
95.45454545454545%
Price, $
$80
100%
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353884 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.03
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
73.77279102384293%
Multi-Core
3013
71.48279952550415%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |